Date of Award

1997

Document Type

Research Paper

Department

Whittier Scholars Program

First Advisor

Richard Archer

Second Advisor

Anne Kiley

Abstract

Historians of nineteenth century gender have based a great portion of their studies on the assumption of the historical accuracy of ideologies such as separate spheres, the cult of true womanhood and the self made man. Yet many of these ideas may not be complex enough theories with which to analyze gendered behavior in the nineteenth century. This must, then, cause us to view our standard gender histories with skepticism. It does not mean we should discard old interpretations, but that we must use them only as guides with give a vague shape to past gender relations. Perhaps we do need to re-evaluate scholarship of the nineteenth century gender to create new models. In the meantime, however, we should use extant models with caution. A modification in our usage of these ideas, adding more qualification and examination rather than applying them as absolutely true should yield, in the end, a bigger and better picture of the gender interactions in the nineteenth century.

Share

COinS